Hi Rob,
If you like the 10.1" form factor, both the EP1000 and Q584 are nice units, with the main differences being aligned with your "environmental" factors and a few personal preferences. The EP1000 has more accessories which are readily available (Fuji stuff is still hard to get quickly and they are notoriously slow here in North America) where the Q584 is more weather resistant. One of my EP1000 units bit the dust after I tried to see if it would match up underwater with the Q584 in a more extreme test. That was MY fault as the EP1000 is not rated for 3' and 30 minutes... an expensive lesson for me ;-) The screen basically fritzed out - the unit still runs when connected to the docking station and an external monitor, so I'll use it for some software testing, but lets just say that it is now a pretty expensive "net top slice computer." ;-) I sent it to HP to get a repair estimate but it turned out that I can buy a new unit for less, so that's the end of THAT story... I should have put the unit in the Rugged Cover before submersing it that deep for so long. :-\
With that experience fresh in my mind, I've not had the courage to dunk my TP10, and I won't until I get an IPX rating from Lenovo. Even then, I doubt I'll do it without the $59 Lenovo Rugged Cover accessory (my actual, purchased unit has not shown up yet) and being assured what level of added protection it brings.
All that said, I have every confidence that any of these will survive the "rain gutter" test just fine, which realistically is about 100 times more "humidity" than any of us would willingly inspect properties in
So, even a moderate rain should be no problem with any of these three, even "naked." Of course, the Q584 needs no accessory for water/dirt - the only reason one might get a "bump case" is for drops onto a hard surface - grass, flowerbeds, even packed dirt, etc. are not an issue.
The Q584 and TP10 both use a Wacom digitizer pen/screen layer where the HP uses an Atmel combo. For note taking, they are essentially competitive with just minor real world differences. For "art", it is a different story. There are plusses and minuses to each, but nothing worth discussing here ATM. Just try each and see if any of the items Lisa illustrated is really a factor.
The SP3 is another animal altogether; larger, heavier and more powerful - all factors stemming from the larger screen and more powerful (and power hungry) Core i5 CPU, etc. The SP3 screen is not as bright as the other 3 but MS has done some good work with regard to the reflectivity, so in most shady areas, the SP3 is adequate (and improved with a good anti-glare screen protector.)
I still owe folks here my screen shots, or at least write up of my tests with two different screen protectors. I have another set on order and want to include those now...
The main issue I have with the SP3 is that for most of the folks I know (or that we support), it is just a little large, and without an effective "bump case", it can be unwieldy during inspections. Note that the SP line is intended as an inside device. No question about it, though - the SP3, being a "full PC", makes a more complete "all-in-one, desktop replacement class" machine, so if that is what you need, then that is the better choice for you. I have personally found (and observed via feedback) that the 10.1" form factor is near the upper limit for size/weight ergonomic type things for MOST folks who do inspections.
In theory, a future "SP4" with an 11", 3:2 aspect ratio and using fan-less Broadwell would be near perfect. (See "Llama Mountain" stuff for an idea on what fan-less Broadwell brings with respect to size, weight, battery, etc.) I am a big fan of the 3:2 aspect ratio. 16:10 is MUCH better than 16:9 when you are talking tablet sizes, but 3:2 (15:10) is even better, per my previous comments on software factors.
The Q704 is a fine machine, but again, I find (and others report) that the form factor is just a little unwieldy - even more so than the SP3 per 16:9 aspect ratio, weight (2.16 lb. vs. 1.76 for SP2), etc., BUT the Q704 does have good IPX specs, and so if that is an issue, it would be a better choice IMHO. Fujitsu also has a history of having decent accessories available for mobility workers, even if getting stuff takes a little longer. If it is what you need, and that spells the difference between something actually working for you, then the wait and extra money are secondary factors IMHO.
All in all, given that MOST of us already have decent (enough) desktop/laptop systems at home/office which we rely on for the bulk of our "heavy lifting", we find that MOST people do better with a competent "companion device" vs. mobile desktop
replacement machine. You'll save some money up front and only part of that savings will go toward other important items like case/strap, accidental drop policy, 4G module (?), etc. - things that will likely actually help you be more productive
in the field. The big reason why most folks go with a WIn 8.1+ companion device is due to their need/desire to run "legacy" full software programs when mobile, vs. specialty "apps" like on iOS and Android. The "companion device" aspect should not be confused with trying to have a full power machine in the field - it is usually not needed. The current crop of Bay Trail Atoms (and more so, the Pentium/Celerons) with 4 GB of RAM (or more) offer adequate performance for most software programs you are likely to run in the field. Not as fast or fluid as on a monster desktop, of course, but good enough. This is a step up from last years Bay Trails with 2 GB of RAM, not to mention the Clover Trail units.
None of the 10.1" (or larger) devices are really "one handed" devices. Those are the 8" devices, but unless your software is tailored for that screen
size, you may find many programs difficult to use. Its not so much the resolution, its the size (and our aging eyes, LOL) and the lack of optimization for mobile use.
Anyway, unless you need a Core i5 (or better) system in the field, we find that your money is better spend today on the "companion" devices. These things change (essentially) annually, and by next Spring, we'll be seeing Broadwell and Cherry Trail releases which are even better with respect to performance (speed and battery) so the smart money gets what works well enough for now, puts it to use and
IF/when a newer machine comes out which will demonstrably pay you back in increased productivity, get it then. Trying to "future proof" things too far in the future is simply an exercise in futility ;-) We find plenty of folks who simply use the "trickle down" thing to give their "old" machine to a helper, family member, etc. The key here is that the "new sweetness" has to actually pay for the upgrade in increased productivity vs. just be a new toy
I think it is great that you can do some 'hands on" - you are very fortunate to have the ability to fondle stuff for yourself! How it feels and works is such a huge part of a success story. I sincerely hope you will share your experiences (good and bad) with the rest of the readers here. We all benefit when folks share and I look forward to your feedback!
-Randall Garrett-
+Apex Software+
/end/