Actually the vast majority of mortgage brokers I deal with were born after 1963. Many were in fact fairly young "kids' born after 1980 - as substantiated by their "My Space", Facebook and other entries. They would brag about their lavish life style quite openly with pictures of their many girl friends, cars etc..
The children of baby boomers have been raised to be scumbags just like their baby boomer parents.
A lot of baby boomers are going to be living on the street or in "yurks" set up in vacant areas. Many will probably subscribe to a nomadic life style with the Hells Angels or such, - especially as the years go by. Not just Baby Boomers.
That is quite possible.
None of the existing systems of government work: Totalitarianism, Communism, Socialism or
whatever it is we have. Although, quite frankly, we have done relatively well with our system of goverment up until recently. But, of course it has been living off of borrowed money.
I think that we essentially have a kleptocracy, where votes, politicians, benefits, etc are all for sale. In theory we have a republic, but it has been so thoroughly corrupted, that I am not sure that it is fair to call it a republic or a democracy.
Well, that depends on what you mean by "work". Some totalitarian systems work quite well for what they are designed to do - keeping the rulers in power and enslaving the population (i.e. North Korea). Communism where tried has always been just Totalitarianism by another name. The only reason it fell from power in the USSR is that Gorbechev, unlike previous Soviet leaders, was not willing to kill a significant part of the population of the USSR and the eastern block countries. If Stalin were alive in the late 1980's, eqarly 1990's, the Berlin wall would still be standing. Our system of government and the social democracies of western Europe have both spent the past 50 years borrowing against their children's future. Now, the bills are coming due and society is going to radically change as it will be impossible to pay the promised benefits. Things have the potential to get very ugly and their is a very real chance of significant breakdowns in the social fabric. When the social fabric breaks down, totalitarianism is a very real possibility.
With 30 days to go Obama is projected to win by a landslide, 338 to 200 electoral votes projected by intrade.com, 353 to 185 by RealClearPolitics.com and has a 5.9% lead in the popular vote according to the RCP Average and a 9% lead according to Gallup. [Interestingly, you can buy a "contract" (similar to a share) for Obama on Intrade.com for $6.67. That means if Obama wins you get $10 minus a $.50 commission for each contract, netting $2.53 per contract or a 42% profit in about 31 days, as of October 4. Tempting. - Of course if he loses for some reason, you loose everything. McCains contract sells for $3.35.]
That is quite tempting.
Anyway, with Obama and a likely larger majority of Democrats in the Senate, laws will get changed. Anything the goverment will do will probably get done - at least to a certain extent. It doesn't look though, like the intelligence of the goverment is going to be able to effectively deal with the intricacies of our problems. And no doubt whatever they do is going to stifle the commercial sector for years to come.
Unless the Democrats get an effective working majority of 60 senators, the amount of changes that can be made is limited due to the filibuster.
Now let me suggest we may be headed towards a Singapore model. The Singapore government builds flats for people to buy with their savings - and the cost is relatively low. It is fairly easy for newlyweds to buy a 1-2 bedroom flat. Prices vary from $50,000 upward. Medical care is much less than in the US, education is free. It seems to work ... The parallel here would be that the government takes control of these real estate assets it is buying up and provides them to the public in similar plans - where there is some savings. BTW, taxes are essentially modest:
http://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/default.aspx
I don't think the Singapore model will work here. Singapore is just essentially a large city, and, as such, is relatively easily managed. I don't believe that the Singapore model is workable in such a large nation.
One special problem that we face, is that California is so large that it is really a separate nation. The 2-way dependency on funds creates a major conflict of interest in certain areas. For example, California gets more property tax with hyper-appreciation - and yet, it is the US taxpayer who foots the bill for the damages. Some kind of accountability has to be created - or this problem will SURELY reoccur.
Bert Craytor, SRA