Well, Wayne, I thought I was being helpful. I simply told him to make sure he included the home owner was the one who told him there was only one appraiser in the review report. Then I felt I needed to point out that the use of the word "loosing" which is widely mis-used on this forum should not be mis-used in his report. Poor grammar and mis-spellings can ruin the credibility of a field review as it gives the original appraiser ammo to take up issues with the review instead of the problems with the original appraisal report. If everyone re-reads my original post you will see I was just reminding him not to mis-spell that word in his report. I was not degrading him, but he took it that way. Everything I posted was about the input of his review report. I have done hundreds of reviews and wanted him to know that reviews will get dissected like lab animals by the lender and the original appraiser in an attempt to discredit the review.
I have mis-spelled words here on the forum and been corrected. I don't take it personally. I usually laugh and say "whoops." But, I certainly remember it was a word I mis-spelled in the next few times I use it.
Now, this post is still on topic. Dean, I was not trying to hurt your appraiser feelings, I was trying to save you embarrassment in the review of your review. Nothing else.
Okay, one item, then i am back on topic. This may get interesting, i just recieved a call from the State on this. Hopefully, as this is just a simple case of did or did not inspect, it will not take long to resolve.
Tim, you just cant help yourself.
And, why the heck would i even be using the word losing in the report, when the context of that word in my original post was somewhere along the lines of that i probably lost money on this one as i had spent so much time working in it.
Just exactly where in the review would i use that statement?
Does anyone really care how long it took for me to do this.
There are several people on this forum, you included who are so obviously jaded by the busness and all the crap that goes on, that it shines strongly through in your posts. You have a condesending way, which is sad because rather than being negative so much of the time, you probably have a wealth of information to offer.
I put your posts in the category of "highly intelligent, can probably teach us younger ones a lot, but dont read many of your posts due to your tone and general attitude."
Tim as an appraiser, you are probably very ethical, very good, extremely dilligent and knowledgable. That Tim could be a positive influence to many on this forum.
Listen, we are all tired of the bull**** that that is ripe in the business, some of us just try to be more positive about it.
I dont have as much time in the business as many of you, i'm about ten years total into this, and trust me, i have come across my share of idiots with a license.
You didnt hurt my appraiser feelings Tim, I have come to expect nothing else from you. Pointing out a spelling mistake in a serious post is childlike and a waste of everyones time. The post was about a did, did not inspect issue. Thanks for the CMA advice, but i think i have that covered. In fact, im pretty sure that the review and all of the data i wrote in that review is very accurate and well presented.
Willie, there is nothing lost in translation with Tims post. Im sorry, but i get ****ed off when certain people continue to make posts that just are not helpful. I posted this in the Tennessee Forum as there seems to be more people in this section that i have a healthy respect for.
Back to the topic, i will not address the above isue again.
are descendents.
