Mejappz
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
Fixed it for ya
Right. That’s why I suggested if you have the choice between doing an eval and an appraisal the choice is obvious.
Fixed it for ya
You got sued on a "full" appraisal....I've been sued before over piffle - a report that they claimed they 'relied upon' yet was prepared days after the transaction closed. I actually had a recorded copy of the deed in the report.
Mine was opposite....No one cares to read about the woes or ancient stories of old CG's.
Licensed in 1992
Upgrade in 1993
Upgrade in 1994
CG in 1996
Why would they not create just as much liability?But that still doesn't prove that "alternative appraisal products" create "more liability" than traditional appraisal products....
Well, you didn't have to go through the experience hours, the 2 years as a trainee, required education, the interview with the state board, etc. after going through same for my CR. You took the same CG test that George made a 100 on. Now , some of you guys are retired or semi-retired but are still willing to take low fee work? I don't get why.Mine was opposite....
When licensing was required....
Started as CG in CA....
Downgraded to CR in RI & MA....
My shame....
I did more than you did to earn the CG.I invested more, had to go through 2 more years as a trainee, pay for more education, have my appraisals scrutinized, go through an interview with the state, etc while working as a CR.You are the only CG I have ever seen on this forum who has been so bitter about what it took them to earn it or what it takes to get the CG work. Chronically and repeatedly.
As for the appraisers with whom I was impressed back in the day perhaps I'm easily impressed.