How unlucky can one get?

[Couch Potato]

Well complete moron was my thought.

I think that is a fairly safe bet.

 

[BRCJR]

Maybe, maybe not.

The issue (the obvious issue...there appears to be more) is that the CR can't communicate an appraisal of a non-residential property lacking a CG's signature as Super. Appraiser.

Not totally true, in Virginia non-residential up tp a 250,000 dollar transacation value may be performed by licensed and certified residential if they are qualified to perform the property type in question.

 

[Lee Lansford]

Not totally true, in Virginia non-residential up tp a 250,000 dollar transacation value may be performed by licensed and certified residential if they are qualified to perform the property type in question.

Bill, my comment is specific to Illinois.

Lee

 

[Mike Kennedy]

I do not know if it helps much; however, I have begun to include the following disclaimer in my reports:

THIS APPRAISER WILL ONLY GUARANTEE AN APPRAISAL THAT IS IDENTICAL TO MY FILE COPY (ELECTRONIC AND/OR HARD COPY), ANY APPRAISAL THAT IS NOT IDENTICAL CAN BE ASSUMED TO BE ALTERED AND NOT RELIABLE.

Suggesting changing the bold to "CERTIFY".:icon_idea:

 

[Mike Kennedy]

Sounds like hes in dire need of a license REVOCATION ... why would anyone let this person continue to be an appraiser? Not only has he violated the ethics provision, he misled his client, he was not competent to do the appraisal report, and on top of that he stole someone elses work? FOUR STRIKES HES DONE ....

This is the most blatent example of unethical we have seen here. I say the board should tell him GOODBYE.

USPAP classes would be a waste of the USPAP instructors time.

AHEM. SEE ABOVE. "comfortable CELL"....I.E. jail cell.:icon_idea:

 

[stefan olafson]

Congrats Brian, you've found one who actually deserves the full weight of the Illinois Board coming down on them. As one who has had his license revoked, it is heart warming that you may actually do something when this type of fraud is perpetrated. When honest errors are made, when different people read USPAP differently, that is not an offense that rises to the level of revocation.

When a report is essentially copied and completed by someone who should have nothing to do with the appraisal, that's grounds for revocation.

 

[liberated]

Suggesting changing the bold to "CERTIFY".:icon_idea:

Thank you. Certify is much better wording.