So two appointees in the same city is a violation of the diversity requirement?
The "continue reading" link no longer functions. But the gist was that the appraiser (and MAI according to your) had a suspension for inflating values and goes on to say that this sends the wrong message to residential appraisers. Nothing after that.
So what does that part have to do with the geographic diversity issue that seems to be the focal point of your angst? Where are the other appointees located?
The term in 93e is "geographically diverse areas of the State". Having two appointees from the same city is not diverse by any stretch of the imagination. Either comply with the law, change the law or stop pretending that honesty and ethics are important for our leaders.. I want lose any sleep over this...but I will not stop talking about it and teaching about it until his term is up or he man's up and resigns.The "diversity" must be among the Governors five appointees (and I think this is USPAP Compliant's issue). The term "diversity" is not exclusive. It simply means a "great variety."
So two appointees in the same city is a violation of the diversity requirement?
The "continue reading" link no longer functions. But the gist was that the appraiser (and MAI according to your) had a suspension for inflating values and goes on to say that this sends the wrong message to residential appraisers. Nothing after that.
So what does that part have to do with the geographic diversity issue that seems to be the focal point of your angst? Where are the other appointees located?
No!!!!! The recently appointed appraiser & MAI was never involved with inflating any appraisals. He (Hector Ingram, MAI) went ballistic several years back when a black lady (Lauriette West-Hoff) was appointed to the NCAB. This lady, Lauriette West-Hoff had her license suspended some years ago for......inflating appraisals. Ingram, our new board member went on a rampage about her not being qualified for a board appointment. I agreed with him then and still do. She was not reappointed. The connection is that he wanted to reverse her appointment due to her dishonesty and now he has accepted an appointment that violates state law. You can't have it both ways. It shows a lack of integrity on his part to accept the appointment.
he has accepted an appointment that violates state law. You can't have it both ways.
Read the law
I don't mean to tread into state issues, where I am not a resident. Seems to me the governor may have violated the intent of the state law, and not necessarily the recipient of the appointment to the state position.