So am I. Disappointed amongst numerous other words to describe the appraisers reactions on this site compared to others.
To quote you from a previous post on this site entitled, What does it mean to protect the public trust?
https://appraisersforum.com/forums/threads/what-does-it-mean-to-protect-the-public-trust.236041/
"It's not okay to let your profession be run into the ground by clients seeking the fastest and cheapest ways around you. It may be "reality", but it's far from "okay". Independent valuations are a vital component of our nation's financial system."
"Appraisers must not allow clients to constrain the scope of work to such an extent that it affects the credibility of the report.
"we're all so misinformed that we don't understand what's actually happening to us."
Yet not one of you used this, as appraisers blog did, as an example to save your sinking profession.
https://appraisersblogs.com/lack-of-fee-transparency-exposing-the-AMC-exploitation/
This post clearly separates the ethical from the spineless and anyone boasting about giving her "double barrels" defending an appraiser who produced an appraisal with over 20 deficiencies definitely falls into the later.
Ethical appraisers know "It is apparent to me that the appraiser allowed the AMC, Class Appraisals, to pressure them to complete the report quickly which leads to errors in the reports."
And the same appraisers attempting to deflect their responsibilities onto the borrower can be found commenting and confirming the unethical practices of this very lender and AMC on this site.
Ethical appraisers know "The appraisal report is prepared for the Client and FHA not the buyer and it is not the buyers’ responsibility to find or cure defects in the appraisal or the home inspection."
Yet appraisers on this site spewed intended user clause bs.
Anyone who spent their time seeking out the borrowers address and publicly posting it instead of posting a comment in the most recent CFPB docket to save what's left of your profession definitely falls into the later.
That same person seemed surprised that, "Well, when it was posted on Appraiser Blog, she got lots of positive responses from appraisers"
Again, the difference between the ethical and the spineless.
"This is a total failure on the part of the appraiser, Class Appraisals (agent for the lender), Lender/Client and FHA and all should be found liable to the buyer. Everyone of these parties profited from this transaction at the expense of the buyer. This is a miscarriage of Justice."
The hypocrisy on this site is disturbing when you are responding to a borrower rather than a colleague and your profession definitely does not deserve the public’s trust much less provide it.
It can be seen here in a post by Mejappz
https://appraisersforum.com/forums/...air-practices-hurting-consumers.238121/page-5
"Kudos to Cindy Chance for finally speaking up about the atrocities against the public trust that are committed by AMCs and Lenders. Kelly Queen of Davids should take note."
"We are committed to getting the message to consumers that appraisers perform an essential function in our economic system, and anything that interferes with the professionalism and quality of an appraisal is a risk to the public. It is sad indeed that many AMCs, put in place to ensure quality in appraisals, are doing just the opposite
Cindy Chance, CEO"
Or here NC Appraising said
https://appraisersforum.com/forums/threads/im-not-surprised.238524/page-11#post-3414996
"Send that to the law firm also. Let the lawyers sue them of behalf of the borrowers in a class action lawsuit suit. We have to make the borrower the victim. If enough groups can lobby or raise cane to the right people about how the borrowers are being overcharged, maybe things will change and we could benefit from it..."
and Surf Cat confirmed
https://appraisersforum.com/forums/...ical-unworkability.238484/page-4#post-3411572
"The ol AMC carrot on a stick tactic to make the appraiser Mule to keep trudging forward. Cheapest and fastest wins the day"
Instead of finding ways to attack a borrower for discovering and exposing the effects of the lack of integrity in appraising, find a way to stand up to the lenders/AMC’s that force you to commit fraud or work for $200 in order to continue receiving work to feed your families because you are too afraid to speak up. The spineless appraisers have given into the lender/AMC inflating values to unrealistic numbers to the point where home owner ship is almost unobtainable.
Here are some starting points
https://appraisersblogs.com/fight-unfair-AMC-practices-leverage-state-authorities/
https://appraisersblogs.com/apprais...ce-council-exposes-disturbing-AMC-violations/
Because as seen in the lack of recourse in my situation and as confirmed by Glen Walker, on a different colleague to colleague post of course,
"There is no such thing as public trust when the public is not considered the Client. The borrower has no control over who he/she employs to do a job for them."
And a few more references from an ethical appraiser focused on the real issue asking for names of players to be exposed in order protect the public rather than attack it,
"The judge should have a better understanding that a financed buyer literally can not purchase a home as is in this regard, because it did not meet MPR minimum property standards as defined by HUD and the lender whom underwrote the loan. Please state the specific company names of all parties involved for the public record."
https://www.usa.gov/mortgage-company-complaints
Related. Minimum property standards.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/mortgages-real-estate/11/FHA-minimum-property-standards.asp
https://www.HUD.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/4000.1hsgh-011823.pdf
Control+F for the search tool / Keyword; Septic.
https://www.FHA.com/fha_article?id=531
Even more insulting is the time you spent here deflecting when you've confirmed on this site that you are aware of the following.
"Fannie doesn't give lenders the option of delivering loans to them with "potential issues". They force the appraiser to identify them and the lender to correct them prior to delivery. That's why appraisers need to be diligent with that process, they are the only thing standing between the lender selling "their risk" on to Fannie improperly and will definitely be targeted if noncompliance ever comes to Fannie's attention. Including filing complaints against the appraiser's license with the state. Lots of clients put improper pressure on appraisers to ignore serious defects and the first time the appraiser "balks" at the prospect they are replaced."
Like Mike said you're all so misinformed that you don't understand what's actually happening to you, and this post that has over 15k views defending the appraiser or deflecting to the borrower, yet the CFPB's open docket period regarding what you're being paid by AMC's that fuels this incompetence received 973 comments proves it.
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/CFPB-2024-0021
Happy Appraising