• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Letter From FNMA 'Baptist' can't be in report...

That's what I was afraid would happen. MAGAs thinking Trump won mean they can go back to their nonWoke ways.
Hate to tell you this but it ain't gonna happen.
Non-woke ways..hmmm an example is the bathroom issue. Male & Female. It's biological/science Yes, there is a tiny faction that thinks they can pick an choose on any given day what their sex is. The majority do not agree, nor do they want to accommodate that tiny group. The only answer is a third bathroom, designated as either/or. This gets even worse because these males who self identify as a female so they can not only compete in women's, sports but dominate female college level sports.

So go ahead and try to defend this woke garbage. btw corporations are rejecting DEI and going back to meritocracy.

So here we are today, The left still wants it their way. The Majority said no.

Your move Sherlock! Get back on the topic of this thread. This thread is about Subjective words and phrases used in our reports. It may indicate you have bias and worse it may influence readers/users of our reports.
 
Last edited:
You pay me my fee, don't annoy me, and i will roll over for his/her/them/wha da/yo/yous/no baptists here tummy scratch appraisal.
Some of yous have to high an opinion of what you do, or not wanting to do. The living dead complaining is kinda ironic.
 
We have so many places of worship in Shelby County. They range from a converted shotgun house built in 1910 (maybe 600 sf) to one of the largest baptist churches in the nation.

They are not all protestant places of worship. We have a melting pot of places to worship.

It really makes this whole topic ridiculous. It don't make sense to me.

Many different types of religions have their own private schools and they are not cheap schools to attend.

Lower class sizes than public schools and more one on one interaction with the students.

In their private schools, if you don't like the religion, you won't be accepted regardless of how much money you have.

That is like Memphis Country Club. You have to be elite in politics or know somebody or be kin to somebody to be a member. It don't matter how much money you got.

My brother in law is rich and lives in Knoxville and wanted to be a member. No way. My old mentor was a member but his wife was big in history of politics with Memphis.
 
Last edited:
These people have lost their minds. I got a letter from FNMA bc the neighborhood section in my report, on an appraisal of a house in a small town that happens to have a university, is named Southwest Baptist University.

FNMA says I can't say the word Baptist. Cited two reports in the area with the same verbiage (its canned) and that they would be monitoring my reports. Its reverse discrimination...the university's name itself is now a no no....

WHAT!?!?!?!?!? Anyone else get one of these?
Can you say nachocheesefries in a report?:LOL:

It has a little racial bias I think. :cautious:

I'm kidding. Always focus on subject real property rights. It will keep you out of trouble.
 
Many many people would die for their religion. World wide.
 
Definition of nacho:


Your referring to Mexico. Be careful.

"probably borrowed from Spanish Nacho, hypocoristic form of the personal name Ignacio

Note: According to a story that apparently first appeared in the San Antonio Express on May 23, 1954 ("Nacho's? Natch!", by Clarence D. LaRoche, p. 3H), the dish was devised in 1940 by Ignacio "Nacho" Anaya García (1895-1975), a waiter (in other versions a maitre d' or chef) at a restaurant in Piedras Negras, Mexico. As related by LaRoche and in later versions, the story has stock elements of a culinary origin myth: late in the day a waiter or chef is pressed to come up with food to satisfy hungry customers and with limited ingredients left in the kitchen invents a new dish. Similar stories purport to explain the origins of other eponymous dishes, as the Reuben sandwich, Buffalo wings and Caesar salad. Though a print connection between "Nacho" Anaya and nachos is relatively early—predating the popularity of the snack outside south Texas—the first citations for nacho, in 1948 and 1949, make no reference to him."

:)
 
Here's my previous description of my current old urban neighborhood called port richmond cause it located next to the river. Sound very fancy. The neighborhood is an old industrial section of the city which was mostly populated by polish immigrants who were brought in as cheap labor. Port richmond has the highest ratio of catholic churches per population than anywhere in the usa. We also had some lithuanians, some italians who were the loans sharks, and some irish mobsters who made the meth. Next to our neighborhood is the highest drug use neighborhood in the county, shown on tv.

Smoke and letters flying out of CU.
 
Can I say sushi, mexican or chinsese restaurant or grocery?

Why is religion being singled out?

Best way is keep it neutral on any prohibited basis. Age, gender, etc.

Look at this:



"What Is Regulation B (Reg B)?
Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), lenders must provide the main reasons for denying credit or taking adverse action against an applicant. This is enforced through Regulation B. Regulation B is intended to prevent applicants from discrimination in any aspect of a credit transaction. It outlines the rules lenders must adhere to when obtaining and processing credit information. Regulation B protects consumers and prohibits lenders from discriminating based on age, gender, ethnicity, nationality, or marital status."


Understand the prohibited basis?
 

Fannie Mae Agrees to Settle REO Discrimination Case​

Enza G. Boderone

Stay informed and up-to-date on important topics
Subscribe now
RSS:
Share:
Fannie Mae has reached a historic $53 million settlement with the National Fair Housing Alliance (“NFHA”) and local fair housing organizations throughout the U.S. to resolve racial discrimination claims concerning Fannie Mae’s management and marketing of real estate owned (“REO”) properties. The settlement is the largest one ever in the U.S. for discrimination in the handling of REOs. In 2016, the plaintiffs filed suit, alleging that Fannie Mae had failed to maintain foreclosed properties in non-white neighborhoods to the same quality and standards as it did in comparable white neighborhoods. The plaintiffs further alleged that Fannie Mae’s differential treatment exacerbated the damage caused to these neighborhoods by the 2008 real estate collapse and impeded their recovery.

Significantly, the lawsuit was the first time a federal court confirmed that fair housing laws govern the maintenance and disposition of REO properties. In other words, lenders can be held liable for fair housing violations in the management of their foreclosed properties.

The lawsuit came after a four-year investigation of more than 2,300 Fannie Mae-owned properties across 39 metropolitan areas revealed a systemic trend by Fannie Mae of allegedly neglecting REO properties in predominantly black and Latino neighborhoods.

In addition to the payment of $53 million, Fannie Mae agreed to enhance its REO maintenance and marketing activities, strengthen fair housing guidance for its vendors, increase inspections of REOs in majority minority areas, and “retool” its quality control methodology. According to counsel for NHFA, the vast majority of the settlement funds will be invested directly back into the communities harmed by the disparate treatment.

This is not the first time that the NFHA has made REO discrimination claims. In 2013, Wells Fargo settled similar claims with NFHA for $39 million. Similar cases filed by NFHA and local housing organizations are currently pending against private lenders. In February 2018, the NFHA and 19 fair housing organizations filed a housing discrimination suit against Deutsche Bank and its servicers, Ocwen Financial Corp. and Altisource Portfolio Solutions, who are responsible for maintaining and marketing the lender’s foreclosed properties. A few months later, a similar suit was filed by the NFHA and local housing organizations against Bank of America and Safeguard Properties Management. Both lawsuits allege that these private lenders and servicers intentionally failed to maintain REO properties in the same manner as other REO properties in comparable white communities.

Fannie Mae’s settlement is a major development. Not only is it the largest settlement of its kind, Fannie Mae has been pushed to evaluate and change its REO practices to ensure same standards are applied in all neighborhoods regardless of race or ethnic background. Private lenders should not wait for a claim against them to evaluate their own practices concerning REO properties in majority minority communities. As this settlement demonstrates, failure to address these types of issues can be costly


we are just helping to pay for their sins... :unsure: :ROFLMAO:
I don't know the details but on its face this seems dumb. I can see a point of maintaining properties at higher price points more from a business standpoint. I see plenty that FNMA has renovated before selling in areas with large minority populations.

If anything wouldn't this have cheaper opportunities for homeownership?
 
Last edited:
Another reference. You can't discriminate on religion:


That is constitution. Forget local laws on that one.

Always focus on real property rights.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top