Atlanta CG
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Georgia
Some require the in-law unit to be a certain size smaller than the main. Check with the zoning.
Yup. It is all about the commission and the least amount of work. I have a hard time believing the appraiser didn't see the kitchen with a missing stove and label it a great room without being misleading. I bet the photos from that appraisal conveniently left out the telling signs.
I cannot fathom why lenders are so biased against a second kitchen area. The old timers often used to have two kitchens, often one stove was on a screened in porch for canning produce in summer when the kitchen otherwise became unbearably hot. I've appraised a number of older farms that actually had a separate building with stove and canning equipment. I know that dates me about 50 years, but who knows, it might come back. In my career we've went from galley kitchens (since no one cooked) to exotica in cookware as everyone tries to be a five star chef. I've seen my mother at canning time drenched in sweat because there wasn't any AC in the house and the breeze through the kitchen wasn't enough to keep cool even with a fan in the window. Once garden started canning included beans, making kraut, potatoes, tomatoes, jellies, apples, peaches, you name it. It got canned and stored.
If the stove is no longer in the room, why would labeling it a "great room" be misleading?
The lender would be happy to see, in the photo, the gaping "hole" from where the stove was removed.
From my limited experience, most lenders require that the photo include the "gap" to show the stove was removed.
We own a SFR that has a mother-daughter layout so we're trying to get some clarification prior to listing our home for sale so we can bypass any unforeseen hiccups down the road. When you walk in through the main entrance you can go left to the mother / main part of the home, or you can walk down the hallway and make a right into the second part of the home. The main part of the home has 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, kitchen, all the standard stuff. The daughter / other side of the home has a kitchen as well, bedroom, living room and another bathroom. It is legally a SFR on paper and not a 2-unit.
A little backstory, we refinanced our home in 2012 and our loan officer told us that the 2nd kitchen could create an issue with the appraisal. He instructed us to remove the stove, cap the gas line, move the stove to the garage, and cover it with a tarp. Everything went smooth and the appraiser listed the 2nd kitchen as a great room.
As of right now the stove is back in place and fully functional as a 2nd kitchen, we also put in a refrigerator. So my question is this: Will a 2nd kitchen with a functional stove create an conflict with FNMA or FHLMC guidelines when it comes time for the buyer to have the home appraised or have any negative impact in general?
If the stove is no longer in the room, why would labeling it a "great room" be misleading?
The lender would be happy to see, in the photo, the gaping "hole" from where the stove was removed.
From my limited experience, most lenders require that the photo include the "gap" to show the stove was removed.
I kind of agree.....I wouldn't call it a "great room" though. I would disclose all the info and call it either kitchenette or wet bar area.....then explain stove has been removed and capped. Typically when I run into this issue it is the at the request of the lender that either a permit be pulled for 2nd kitchen or that they simply remove and cap stove line.
It would be misleading for the same reason that when an appraiser observed a bed setup in a living room of a one bedroom house, and therefore labeled the living room a bedroom on the appraisal report sketch and described the house as a two bedroom house, the state appraisal board declared it misleading after receiving the complaint I filed over it. The designed function of a room, or the floor plan, doesn't change because one moves the furniture, or one of the appliances.