• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Phil Crawford Podcast

An ok 33+/- minute podcast that would have been good if reduced to around 8- 10 minutes and great if it would have been limited to about 3 minutes. The rest of the time was repetitiveness and bloviating. As appraisers we are expected to process the information and provide a concise opinion.
 
What the whole podcast says to me is Freddie thinks they are more competent in your market area than you are.

That boils my blood a little.

Do you think Freddie is more competent than you in the area you are very competent in?

Freddie realizes the definition of MV defined in the 1004 and other forms.

I digress, the loophole for freddie is we are in risk mangement. We are not licensed professionals to appraise real property in your market.
 
Last edited:
In George's comments regarding Phil's previous podcast, all he did was question if the data set was as comparable as presented. Based on what George posted, in my opinion some of the properties were not that comparable and may have tainted Phil's conclusions.

Unfortunately, all Phil did was call out Georg for doxing, but failed to provide any sort of backup or support for his initial comments and conclusions. One could almost make the argument that Phil did the same thing that he is accusing F/F of doing by cherry picking the data set in order to support their pre-determined conclusions.
 
What the whole podcast says to me is Freddie thinks they are more competent in your market area than you are.

That boils my blood a little.

Do you think Freddie is more competent than you in the area you are very competent in?

Freddie realizes the definition of MV defined in the 1004 and other forms.

I digress, the loophole for freddie is we are in risk mangement. We are not licensed professionals to appraise real property in your market.
Stay focused on this target. Forget George and Phil for a moment.


Danny kept saying we are in risk mangement. Danny did or does live a relatively homogeneous real property market. From a MSA standpoint in Tennessee, Nashville is the most homogeneous real property market.

Risk management?
 
Danny and George are not licensed professionals in all of your markets yet a waiver is based on what?
 
Ask Joan Trice. She will tell you. Joan knows everything.
 
Yeah, with me it goes back to truth in lending disclosures to the borrower. It is like commingling of fees and now we offer you a waiver based on WTH?
The borrower knows they are getting a waiver. They approve it; they have a choice. (that is why it is called Value Acceptance now - the borrower accepted the value )

The disclosure should be available for everyone else to see- RE agents, lenders, appraisers, analysis, anybody. Just like the other financing info is available to see - FHA< VA< cash etc

True, Waiver is part of conventional financing, but it is a distinct segment of it and can affect RE prices.
 
In my opinion there are several potential problems with appraisal waivers:
- Unsupported increases in sale prices in certain areas.
- Increase default rates should market values decrease.
- Cause an increase in interest rates as investors are leery of the potential increase loss rate based on an increasing use of waivers, especially for borrowers who may be borderline qualified in more than one category (ie. DTI, LTV, Credit Score, Job Time, etc.). Basically, lending comes down to the three "C's", character, credit and collateral. If one of these is weak the other two need to be strong in order to offset.

As pointed out in the broadcast, F/F seem more interested in the default rate than the potential loss. In my nearly 50 years of bank lending, appraisal and real estate experience I know it will generally take 5 - 10 years for most mortgages to go into default. A high percentage of mortgages that go into default prior to five years, generally had an underlying issue/weakness when approved.

With the widespread use of waivers being relatively new, any purported study of the results/impact is very limited in its ability to predict long-term trends. Personally, F/F cannot be privatized soon enough thus eliminating the Government backing. Let the investors evaluate the risk and invest accordingly. Right now, unelected bureaucrats are making financial decisions that could seriously impact the Federal Governments balance sheet, because if the bureaucrats are wrong the Government will bail them out.
 
What does that have to do with anything. I'm Jewish and do not have a bunch of money. What an ignorant comment. Antisemitic much????
Consider the source!
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top