Anytime women are included in comments, it's serious. Why not mention old or young or any other prohibited basis on discrimination?
I would let it goOn a side note, one time I remembered the actual measurement was like 1 foot longer than original blueprint permit. Clever contractor giving extra area.
If city finds out, would it have to be torn out?
Do I need to mention the difference or let it go?
A foot difference is bigger issue than a 1/10th foot difference.
Your obligation is to client. If client requires ANSI? That's all that matters.On a side note, one time I remembered the actual measurement was like 1 foot longer than original blueprint permit. Clever contractor giving extra area.
If city finds out, would it have to be torn out?
Do I need to mention the difference or let it go?
A foot difference is bigger issue than a 1/10th foot difference.
Zoe you are the one who brought her looks into the equation which is against the Me Too Movements Guidelines and show you are a misogynist male pig and a sexists. You need to take sensitivity training.Anytime women are included in comments, it's serious. Why not mention old or young or any other prohibited basis on discrimination?
I don't think so. I see no problems for appraisers on being more accurate.I have no issue with a standard but measuring to 1/10th foot and adjusting comps to subject open new legal issues for appraisers to worry about.
Instead of worrying about this, Fannie should consider the flaws with all the data it has and rectify appraisers to appraise better.