J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
They were right, and the banks did lose money when if the owner walks ...back up - the bank did not lose money, it became the after market investors and the tax payers funding the loans losing the money.The crux of the issue ^^^. Its basically The Golden Rule. "Those with the gold make the rules. "
Back in the late '80's early '90's when I was principal broker of a small brokerage (15 agents) every lender required:
1. Termite inspection, no exceptions.
2. Unstaked survey, basically the surveyor went to the property to see that the improvements were located within the property lines.
3. Flood Certification from independent vendor.
4. Well/septic inspection from licensed plumber if the house was on well and/or septic.
Eventually, they dropped the requirements for all of these. Buyers/sellers, agents, LO's were all happy because those inspection requirements were expensive and often delayed the closing, especially in busy times. Nobody cared about the inspectors and surveyors losing business...except the inspectors and surveyors.
These guys all sounded like appraisers that believe they are indispensable. "What if the house has termites, what if the garage is located over the property line, what if part of the property is in a flood zone, what if the well or septic doesn't work right...the bank could lose money when/if the owner walks?"
Sound familiar?
I don't think a surveyor is needed, but IMO, if the lender really wanted sound collateral, they would make every valuation subject to a home inspection.