• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

USPAP class for the thirteenth time

If the Trump administration were to address the situation, it might prioritize dismantling or reducing the power of entities like TAF and the ASC to cut down what is seen as excessive or monopolistic control. This approach would align with efforts to limit regulatory burdens on small businesses and prevent "agency capture," where government agencies act more in the interest of entrenched organizations than in the public’s interest.

Here are some of the issues the Trump administration could tackle.

1. Regulatory Rollback: The Trump administration has supported reducing federal regulations. They may seek to scale back ASC’s authority, potentially removing its role as a regulatory enforcer for TAF standards, thus giving states more freedom to implement cost-effective and locally relevant standards.

2. Defunding or Restructuring: To address the concerns of funding through state licensing fees without Congressional reappropriations, the administration could advocate for restructuring ASC’s funding model to increase accountability or limit its funding sources. This change could dismantle the "cycle of spoils" between ASC and The Appraisal Foundation, which fosters monopolistic practices.

3. Promoting Competition By reducing the nonprofit's exclusive grip on appraisal standards, the administration could encourage competition, allowing other entities to develop standards or certifications, giving appraisers more choices and potentially lowering compliance costs.

4. Investigating Agency Capture: Given the precedent in cases like Community Financial Services v. CFPB, the administration might direct investigations into whether the ASC's funding model and relationship with The Appraisal Foundation violate laws governing federal agencies. If found in violation, it could justify significant restructuring or dissolution of these entities.

The ASC is currently under investigation for potential felony violations, signaling that the era of unchecked power within the administrative state may be drawing to a close. Party time is coming to an end on 15th Street.
 
One more thing: TAF better stop inviting "professors" who label appraisers as biased to speak at their events. Such actions run counter to Trump’s commitment to curb government officials and agencies that collaborate with left-leaning media to promote false narratives. He has pledged to press federal charges if necessary, and this stance would also apply to agencies like the GSEs, HUD, ASC, and others.
 

State Appraiser Regulatory Agency Resources​

The Appraisal Foundation (Foundation) maintains a close relationship with state appraiser regulatory agencies and seeks their input on proposed changes to the Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Additionally, the Foundation provides resources to the states to clarify and help implement the minimum qualifications and standards.

The Foundation has also re-instituted the State Regulatory Advisory Group. More information can be found here.

Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials​

https://appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/Resources/Regulatory_Information/TAF/www.aaro.net
AARO%20logo.jpg

The Foundation works closely with the Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials (AARO), an organization of state appraiser regulatory agencies.




Disciplinary Action Matrix​

The Appraisal Foundation has issued voluntary guidance that is intended to assist state appraiser regulatory agencies with enforcement cases.

View the Voluntary Disciplinary Action Matrix for previous versions of USPAP.



State Regulator Training and Workshop Series​

The state regulator training series is for both new and seasoned state regulators to help deepen their understanding of appraisal topics, including navigating the Criteria, USPAP, Degree Review Program, and other topics and resources prevalent in the valuation profession. In these interactive trainings, state regulators will receive resources and guidance from the Foundation and its Boards. We invite attendees to submit questions and topics in advance for a collaborative experience.

Watch the past workshops on our YouTube channel:


pay close attention to the disciplinary action matrix... :ROFLMAO:
 

State Appraiser Regulatory Agency Resources​

The Appraisal Foundation (Foundation) maintains a close relationship with state appraiser regulatory agencies and seeks their input on proposed changes to the Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Additionally, the Foundation provides resources to the states to clarify and help implement the minimum qualifications and standards.

The Foundation has also re-instituted the State Regulatory Advisory Group. More information can be found here.

Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials​

https://appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/Resources/Regulatory_Information/TAF/www.aaro.net
AARO%20logo.jpg

The Foundation works closely with the Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials (AARO), an organization of state appraiser regulatory agencies.




Disciplinary Action Matrix​

The Appraisal Foundation has issued voluntary guidance that is intended to assist state appraiser regulatory agencies with enforcement cases.

View the Voluntary Disciplinary Action Matrix for previous versions of USPAP.



State Regulator Training and Workshop Series​

The state regulator training series is for both new and seasoned state regulators to help deepen their understanding of appraisal topics, including navigating the Criteria, USPAP, Degree Review Program, and other topics and resources prevalent in the valuation profession. In these interactive trainings, state regulators will receive resources and guidance from the Foundation and its Boards. We invite attendees to submit questions and topics in advance for a collaborative experience.

Watch the past workshops on our YouTube channel:


pay close attention to the disciplinary action matrix... :ROFLMAO:
Training for competency with the material is not a form of control or jurisdiction. "This is what we mean".
 
If the Trump administration were to address the situation, it might prioritize dismantling or reducing the power of entities like TAF and the ASC to cut down what is seen as excessive or monopolistic control. This approach would align with efforts to limit regulatory burdens on small businesses and prevent "agency capture," where government agencies act more in the interest of entrenched organizations than in the public’s interest.

Here are some of the issues the Trump administration could tackle.

1. Regulatory Rollback: The Trump administration has supported reducing federal regulations. They may seek to scale back ASC’s authority, potentially removing its role as a regulatory enforcer for TAF standards, thus giving states more freedom to implement cost-effective and locally relevant standards.

2. Defunding or Restructuring: To address the concerns of funding through state licensing fees without Congressional reappropriations, the administration could advocate for restructuring ASC’s funding model to increase accountability or limit its funding sources. This change could dismantle the "cycle of spoils" between ASC and The Appraisal Foundation, which fosters monopolistic practices.

3. Promoting Competition By reducing the nonprofit's exclusive grip on appraisal standards, the administration could encourage competition, allowing other entities to develop standards or certifications, giving appraisers more choices and potentially lowering compliance costs.

4. Investigating Agency Capture: Given the precedent in cases like Community Financial Services v. CFPB, the administration might direct investigations into whether the ASC's funding model and relationship with The Appraisal Foundation violate laws governing federal agencies. If found in violation, it could justify significant restructuring or dissolution of these entities.

The ASC is currently under investigation for potential felony violations, signaling that the era of unchecked power within the administrative state may be drawing to a close. Party time is coming to an end on 15th Street.
So revamp the regulatory system. That will still involve somebody establishing standards and qualifications criteria and it will still involve regulation of the licensees at the state level and all of those activities will be performed by people who, by definition, are all subject to human frailties.

This is not the return to the MB-select market for services that you are looking for. Nor an end to revisions and elaboration of appraisal standards. All that changes are the names and titles. Obviously.

I predict the AI members on the SFR side will suffer the most from any attempts to unwind appraisal standards or licensing. But hey, lets give it a shot. What's the worst that can happen - that their competition in the market explodes and the BAMN conduct prevails?
 
they write quasi rules that are so unclear they need to train the state board investigator monkeys... :ROFLMAO:
 
[shrugs] Consistency doesn't create itself. And that consistency is exactly what you want when it comes to people acting in these roles and making these types of decisions. Untrained transients need not apply.
 
USPAP not clear to attorneys and public. Thus lawsuits. They need to take at least 7 hour course.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top