Asked AI ChatGPT if AI was going to Replace Appraisers...here is what it said back.

[nachocheesefries]

Meet our new village idiot, GPT Chat, as smart as a government controlled Twitter chat room:

"E: What is the difference between the misuse of classified documents and secrets between Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Joe Biden?

A: The handling of classified information by Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden has been a matter of controversy and has been the subject of several investigations.

In the case of Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server for official government communications, instead of using a government-issued email account. This has been a matter of controversy, as it has been alleged that Clinton and her staff may have mishandled classified information by sending and receiving classified emails on a private server. The FBI conducted an investigation into the handling of classified information by Clinton and her staff, and while they found that Clinton and her staff had been "extremely careless" in their handling of classified information, they did not find enough evidence to prove that they had intended to violate laws, and therefore they did not recommend criminal charges against Clinton.

In the case of Donald Trump, during his time in office, there have been allegations that he mishandled classified information by sharing sensitive information with Russian officials in the Oval Office, and by pressuring foreign leaders to investigate his political rivals. The allegations led to an impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives, but the Senate acquitted him.

In the case of Joe Biden, there have been no allegations that he has mishandled classified information.

It's important to note that the investigation and the decision to prosecute or not to prosecute is done by independent law enforcement agencies, and that the decision is based on the evidence and the applicable law."

You are right. We are all just prodding it right now for fun but it does have very usual applications.

I used it last night to solve a problem I am having with another business that I have paid over $20k last year trying to fix, to no avail. No one can figure it out. I input multiple arrays of data in and asked GPT several very specific questions in order to find the issue and it singled out about 10 different problem areas that I am not working on since last night. Trying to rule out the issue, one at a time. Will know in a week or so if its answers were correct. ***Its not one question and done...it can conversate, build and grow the discussion just like talking to a human. Your can explain multiple data points in sentence format and it can figure out a solution.

Its far more useful than just trying to **** it off with our silly questions. Sort of like a smart phone being a super computer but everyone just drones on Tiktok all day. Smart phones capabilities and what they allow users to accomplish is virtually limitless. This is 1000 fold. The current GPT (3 I think), has like 570 GB of text data (huge number), GTP 4 is said to contain 100 TRILLION Parameters...or 500x the current version we are using now. I'm just saying buckle up...its in its infancy.

 

[Elliott]

"E-Does GPT-Chat have intelligence?

A-GPT-Chat is a machine learning model that is trained to generate human-like text based on the input it receives. It has the ability to understand and respond to certain types of language-based tasks, such as language translation or text summarization. However, it does not possess true intelligence, as it does not have consciousness or self-awareness. It does not have the ability to understand the context, to have emotions, to have personal experience or to make decisions. It's a tool that uses advanced algorithms and statistical models to perform certain language-based tasks, but it is not sentient or self-aware.

E-Does GPT-Chat know when it is being disrespected?

A-No, GPT-Chat is a computer program and does not have the ability to perceive or understand concepts such as respect or disrespect. It does not have the ability to understand the context or the intention behind the statement and therefore doesn't have the ability to know whether it is being disrespected or not.

E-What is the difference between GPT chat and a village idiot?

A-GPT-Chat is a language model developed by OpenAI, while a village idiot is a derogatory term used to describe someone who is perceived as mentally impaired or uneducated. GPT-Chat is a tool that can generate human-like text based on the input it receives, while a village idiot is a person who is not capable of understanding or communicating effectively. The two have no comparison."

 

[nachocheesefries]

"E-Does GPT-Chat have intelligence?

A-GPT-Chat is a machine learning model that is trained to generate human-like text based on the input it receives. It has the ability to understand and respond to certain types of language-based tasks, such as language translation or text summarization. However, it does not possess true intelligence, as it does not have consciousness or self-awareness. It does not have the ability to understand the context, to have emotions, to have personal experience or to make decisions. It's a tool that uses advanced algorithms and statistical models to perform certain language-based tasks, but it is not sentient or self-aware.

E-Does GPT-Chat know when it is being disrespected?

A-No, GPT-Chat is a computer program and does not have the ability to perceive or understand concepts such as respect or disrespect. It does not have the ability to understand the context or the intention behind the statement and therefore doesn't have the ability to know whether it is being disrespected or not.

E-What is the difference between GPT chat and a village idiot?

A-GPT-Chat is a language model developed by OpenAI, while a village idiot is a derogatory term used to describe someone who is perceived as mentally impaired or uneducated. GPT-Chat is a tool that can generate human-like text based on the input it receives, while a village idiot is a person who is not capable of understanding or communicating effectively. The two have no comparison."

You gotta ask it a question you don't know the answer to already.....something less subjective.

 

[shrubberyvaluation]

Meet our new village idiot, GPT Chat, as smart as a government controlled Twitter chat room:

"E: What is the difference between the misuse of classified documents and secrets between Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Joe Biden?

A: The handling of classified information by Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden has been a matter of controversy and has been the subject of several investigations.

In the case of Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server for official government communications, instead of using a government-issued email account. This has been a matter of controversy, as it has been alleged that Clinton and her staff may have mishandled classified information by sending and receiving classified emails on a private server. The FBI conducted an investigation into the handling of classified information by Clinton and her staff, and while they found that Clinton and her staff had been "extremely careless" in their handling of classified information, they did not find enough evidence to prove that they had intended to violate laws, and therefore they did not recommend criminal charges against Clinton.

In the case of Donald Trump, during his time in office, there have been allegations that he mishandled classified information by sharing sensitive information with Russian officials in the Oval Office, and by pressuring foreign leaders to investigate his political rivals. The allegations led to an impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives, but the Senate acquitted him.

In the case of Joe Biden, there have been no allegations that he has mishandled classified information.

It's important to note that the investigation and the decision to prosecute or not to prosecute is done by independent law enforcement agencies, and that the decision is based on the evidence and the applicable law."

I think the information GPT has is before the Joe Biden information became public. The case of Donald Trump is laughable, he wasn't even accused of sharing classified info with Russian officials, except maybe by Schiff or some other liar, and calling Zelensky had nothing to do with mishandling classified documents.

 

[shrubberyvaluation]

\

Not biased at all. There are multitudes of Joe Biden's lies that are easily verified, but it has no problem stating things about Trump that it has not verified.

 

[JeffSH]

I think the information GPT has is before the Joe Biden information became public. The case of Donald Trump is laughable, he wasn't even accused of sharing classified info with Russian officials, except maybe by Schiff or some other liar, and calling Zelensky had nothing to do with mishandling classified documents.

 

[shrubberyvaluation]

View attachment 71778

So it is biased based based on the books, articles, websites and other forms of content it is given. It is well documented that Joe Biden has lied many times in his decades in politics, but it was probably just not fed those sources.

 

[shrubberyvaluation]

Biden wrong that Trump could’ve stopped all COVID-19 deaths

Speaking about the coronavirus during a CNN town hall less than two months away from Election Day, former Vice President

www.politifact.com

Looks like Joe Biden did his job wrong according to him.

"If the president had done his job, had done his job from the beginning, all the people would still be alive. All the people. I'm not making this up. Just look at the data."

 

[JeffSH]

So it is biased based based on the books, articles, websites and other forms of content it is given. It is well documented that Joe Biden has lied many times in his decades in politics, but it was probably just not fed those sources.

The model doesn't want to make controversial political statements and it doesn't want to tell you about whether or not some specific statement by a politician is a lie. It will only answer affirmatively if the lie is egregious, like the examples I used.

There are ways to 'trick ask' the AI to get answers that the creators don't want you to receive. Supposedly someone made a phishing website using ChatGPT.

It's obviously going to have a harder time with current or more recent events.

 

[JeffSH]

ChatGPT is BASED