en.wikipedia.org
His education background is not particularly impressive. But, he has a knack for looking at the entire world and connecting all the dice.
He is very, rather overly, steadfast in many of his views. He is a bit recklesss. He has been very wrong on more than one occasion. He admits his miscalculations, such as predicting that the Ukrainians wouldn't last long if invaded by Russia. But, of course, most pundits are wrong. It is a question of degree.
He may be right about Trump not standing a chance of winning the 2024 election.
1. He says the polls don't mean anything until after the conventions, because the independents don't respond to opinion requests until after the conventions, and Trump's election depends critically on the Independent vote.
2. - And he says that based on the 2020 election results, Independents are not going to vote for Trump in significant numbers this time around.
He could be right, he could be wrong. But, it is very clear he is so biased against Trump, one needs to take his Trump opinions with a grain of salt.
I would also question his predictions on the demise of China. I seriously question them. I myself see the outstanding quality of DJI drones, Chinese photographic equipment and accessories first hand - at low cost. There are very many businessmen in the US that would hate seeing such goods banned.
Peter Zeihan is too much of a salesman, he is just as much consumed in creating a populist pro-US posture (to make himself popular) as explaining - to a certain extent - the functional mechanics of various demographic and economic forces on both a national and global level.
With respect to China, what is more likely to happen to China in the worst case, is that the CCP will topple, and China will break up into City States along the coast: Shanghai, Beijing, Hong Kong, Tianjin, Qingdao, Dalian, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Xiamen, Fuzhou, and Shenzhen. Each of these will probably be run as separate City States - much like Singapore. They will be geared towards Export-Import, they will mend ties with the West over time. Peter has admitted the latter possibility - but rather than say that the CCP will fail within 10 years, he just says China will fail. He gets paid $50,000-$100,000 for speeches - and often appears at places like the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey:
nps.edu
I like this coment on Reddit:
"He (Peter Zeihan) sells his intelligence and research to corporations and governments and thus talks like a swamp creature and never steps on toes of those in power in America and close “allied” countries. That being said he actually has some really good insight into global markets, trends, and developments. He was one of the first guys sounding the alarm on Russia wanting to take Ukraine and also has been pretty accurate on China. He by no means is perfect but if you listen to one of his hour long lecture you can actually learn some decent stuff on global affairs. You don’t need to listen to more then one though because they’re all pretty similar. This isn’t a guy I exactly trust but he has some good information and analysis on demographics, supply chains, energy markets and a few other things. I watch him like I watch the news, never fully trusting but will to listen to what his arguments because he’s been right in the past on some pretty major stuff.
He’s 100% a spook though because he talks about working with government agencies pretty regularly."
Yes, he spends time at Langley.