- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
All I know is that he succeeded quite well in deceiving me as to his bona-fides. I also know that I'm not the only one who was deceived. Since he's so enamored with polls maybe he can post one asking if people here actually thought he was a CG from California by the name of J E Smith.
It's not like he picked an abstract for a handle like the one you or a lot of other people use. The JSmith persona he just happened to pick is basically his doppleganger. He's a veteran CG who also sells RE and loans and is heavy into FHA, and he's the *only* J. Smith in the OREAs database that otherwise even comes close. The only aspect that doesn't necessarily fit is that the real J Smith has reportedly resigned his license, which almost invariably only occurs when they're under investigation and about to get thumped by the state for being a team player.
It all just happened to fit how he was presenting himself here, didn't it?
Try to use a little intellectual honesty with this tangent. If someone adopts a handle like JGrant from Florida it's a pretty fair assumption that 99.9% of everyone on this forum is going to think they're interacting with someone who's actually from Florida as opposed to some fictional place like "Vulcan", and that the person's last name actually is Grant.
You're using a handle from Minnesota that leads me to assume that you're a Minnesota CR and you understand what's going on there. I'm trusting you when you make these assertions, whether implicity or explicitly, and that trust contributes directly to the degree of credibility I attribute to your comments. If I were to discover that you're actually a trainee from Kansas and you don't really know what you're talking about with respect to what's going on in MN then that deception, whether active or passive in origin, would undermine my opinion of your credibility.
If you or I didn't care about our respective levels of personal credibility on this forum then it wouldn't be a big deal to play the game here. But you and I both know that personal credibility is the coin of the realm in both our professional practice as well as our participation on this forum of our peers.
If the first step in establishing credibility is to make reasonable assertions as a means of establishing reasonable expectations then the apparently deliberate use of a real someone else's identity is moving in the wrong direction. IMO.
So yeah, I thought I was dealing with a whole new troll. Imagine my surprise when I belatedly discovered I was dealing with the same unicorn hunter from your neighborhood that I've engaged so many times before.
It's not like he picked an abstract for a handle like the one you or a lot of other people use. The JSmith persona he just happened to pick is basically his doppleganger. He's a veteran CG who also sells RE and loans and is heavy into FHA, and he's the *only* J. Smith in the OREAs database that otherwise even comes close. The only aspect that doesn't necessarily fit is that the real J Smith has reportedly resigned his license, which almost invariably only occurs when they're under investigation and about to get thumped by the state for being a team player.
It all just happened to fit how he was presenting himself here, didn't it?
Try to use a little intellectual honesty with this tangent. If someone adopts a handle like JGrant from Florida it's a pretty fair assumption that 99.9% of everyone on this forum is going to think they're interacting with someone who's actually from Florida as opposed to some fictional place like "Vulcan", and that the person's last name actually is Grant.
You're using a handle from Minnesota that leads me to assume that you're a Minnesota CR and you understand what's going on there. I'm trusting you when you make these assertions, whether implicity or explicitly, and that trust contributes directly to the degree of credibility I attribute to your comments. If I were to discover that you're actually a trainee from Kansas and you don't really know what you're talking about with respect to what's going on in MN then that deception, whether active or passive in origin, would undermine my opinion of your credibility.
If you or I didn't care about our respective levels of personal credibility on this forum then it wouldn't be a big deal to play the game here. But you and I both know that personal credibility is the coin of the realm in both our professional practice as well as our participation on this forum of our peers.
If the first step in establishing credibility is to make reasonable assertions as a means of establishing reasonable expectations then the apparently deliberate use of a real someone else's identity is moving in the wrong direction. IMO.
So yeah, I thought I was dealing with a whole new troll. Imagine my surprise when I belatedly discovered I was dealing with the same unicorn hunter from your neighborhood that I've engaged so many times before.